Page updated: April 23, 2020
Author: Emmanuel Boss
View PDF

Water

Water contributes to both absorption and scattering by Sea Water. In clear ocean waters water effect on ocean color in the visible cannot be neglected and hence have to be taken into account. In addition in the NIR water often dominates absorption. Temperature and salinity affect both absorption and scattering by water and hence need to be taken into account when the optical properties of water are computed.

The index of refraction of water relative to air (n) is given by Quan and Fry (1995), based on the data of Austin and Halikas (1974):

n(Tc,λ) = 1.314052.02×106T c2+15.868 0.00423Tc λ 4382 λ2 +1.1455 × 106 λ3 . (1)

This model fit well data from 200-1100nm with an average error of 1.5 × 105 (Zhang and Hu (2009)).

Absorption by water

Absorption as a rich structure due to the the excitation of the different vibrational modes of the water molecule. You can access a compendium of published research on water absorption and values. Water absorption is affected by temperature and salinity (See Sullivan et al. (2006) for latest results on the subject).

Elastic scattering by water According to Einstein-Smolucjowski theory, elastic scattering of light by water is due to fluctuations in the dielectric constant in space caused by random motion of molecules (see Zhang and Hu (2009) and Zhang et al. (2009) for a recent review). Elastic scattering by water has similarities in angular shape and spectral behavior to Rayleigh scattering, however with important differences. For example, the VSF:

β(𝜃) = β(90) ×(1 + 1 δ 1 + δ × cos(𝜃)2), (2)

where δ is the deploarization ratio. Several depolarization ratios have been suggested with δ = 0.039 providing the best fit to data (Zhang et al. (2009)).

Elastic scattering by sea water depends on salinity ( 30% increase for range of salinities observed in the oceans), much less so of temperature ( 4% between 0 and 26C) and pressure ( 1.3% for an increase in P of 100bar).

Rather than repeat the derivations from Zhang and Hu (2009) and Zhang et al. (2009), we provide a link to a matlab function that provide their results and computes the scattering coefficient and the VSF of water at 90 degrees for a given wavelength, salinity and temperature. We summarize their results using a few plots (for a code produced by Zhang here.


PIC

Figure 1: Comparison of Morel, 1968 data and Zhang et al’s (2009) model for scattering by pure water with varying salts. Assumed T = 20C.

Raman scattering by water In Raman scattering a fraction of the incident light of wavenumber ν0 is absorbed and re-emitted at wavenumber νs = ν0 νr where νr is the Raman shift of a vibrational mode of the water molecule (Desiderio (2000)). For water νr = 3400cm1 (Ge et al. (1993)). Remember that wavelength and wavenumber are related through ν = 1λ. The emission wavelegnth (in [nm]) is then:

λs = 1 νs = 2941.2λ0 2941.2 λ0 (3)

PIC

Figure 2: Emission wavelength given excitation wavelength for Raman scattering by pure water. Dotted line is a polynomial fit, λs = 0.0007λ02 + 0.83λ0 + 22.94, which fits the result with less than a 2% relative error.

If E0 represents the irradiance of the incident light [Wm2] and br the volume Raman scattering function [m1], then the total power scattered into the full solid angle for a m3 of water (Is, [W]) is: Is(νs = ν0 νr) = brE0(ν0). The value of br for an excitation wavelength of λ0 = 488nm (20,492cm1) is 2.4 × 104m1 (Desiderio (2000)). In many case we are interested in quanta emitted per quanta absorbed (e.g. for Monte Carlo simulations or to calculate the effect on IOPs, See Desiderio (2000)) in which case: br,q = ν0 νsbr.

To compute br for another wavelength (λ0):

br(λ0) = br(488nm) ×( 107λ0 3400cm1 107488 3400cm1)5 (4)

The phase function of Raman scattering is given by Morel and Gentili (1991) and Pozdnyakov and Grassl (2003):

βr(𝜃) = 3 4π 3 3 + p(1 + pcos2(𝜃)), (5)

where p = 0.84.

Raman scattering is used to calibrate the intensity of the source of a LIDAR system as the signal leaving the ocean is proportional to the intensity of the source Hoge et al. (1988).

Comments for Water:

Loading Conversation